http://bmclain-word.itmblog.com/2008/06/12/the-supreme-idiocy-of-the-supreme-court/ Just another Itmblog.com weblog Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:12:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.4 http://bmclain-word.itmblog.com/2008/06/12/the-supreme-idiocy-of-the-supreme-court/#comment-6 George Gann Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:52:42 +0000 http://bmclain-word.itmblog.com/2008/06/12/the-supreme-idiocy-of-the-supreme-court/#comment-6 1. The Supreme court is not the third legislative branch of our government, it is there to interpret the constitution, not re interpret the constitution. 2. The house and senate are under the control of the democratic party, if they so chose to end the war they can, immediately, they control the money! 3. If Bush was inclined to he can evoke the Geneva convention rules, which would make the enemy combatants pow's, at this point they can be held until the war ends. 1. The Supreme court is not the third legislative branch of our government, it is there to interpret the constitution, not re interpret the constitution.
2. The house and senate are under the control of the democratic party, if they so chose to end the war they can, immediately, they control the money!
3. If Bush was inclined to he can evoke the Geneva convention rules, which would make the enemy combatants pow’s, at this point they can be held until the war ends.

]]> http://bmclain-word.itmblog.com/2008/06/12/the-supreme-idiocy-of-the-supreme-court/#comment-4 Dave Barnes Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:01:06 +0000 http://bmclain-word.itmblog.com/2008/06/12/the-supreme-idiocy-of-the-supreme-court/#comment-4 While offering some interesting insights, you, sir, are so right sided it is actually nauseating. Isn't 8 years of political ineptitude enough? For a gentleman with a degree from a highly regarded school, our dictator, oh, sorry, beloved president, has yet to figure out simple economic formulas. If you want to compare presidents and how they are perceived by the public, just look at the basic approval ratings. For all his faults, Clinton at least didn't leave office being disapproved of by over 60% of the nation. Hey, how about Bush's one time ally, Scott McClellan? He was a good man when he blindly followed Bush, but now his statements are those of a traitor (a.k.a. a liberal in your mind) and his opinions should be discounted as a result, right? One last item: one of your callers stated that Bush was elected president twice. What was the popular vote on the first run? Of course, if Gore had a brother as a governor of a state, things may have been different. Keep on talking, you amuse me. While offering some interesting insights, you, sir, are so right sided it is actually nauseating. Isn’t 8 years of political ineptitude enough? For a gentleman with a degree from a highly regarded school, our dictator, oh, sorry, beloved president, has yet to figure out simple economic formulas.
If you want to compare presidents and how they are perceived by the public, just look at the basic approval ratings. For all his faults, Clinton at least didn’t leave office being disapproved of by over 60% of the nation.
Hey, how about Bush’s one time ally, Scott McClellan? He was a good man when he blindly followed Bush, but now his statements are those of a traitor (a.k.a. a liberal in your mind) and his opinions should be discounted as a result, right?
One last item: one of your callers stated that Bush was elected president twice. What was the popular vote on the first run? Of course, if Gore had a brother as a governor of a state, things may have been different.
Keep on talking, you amuse me.

]]>